Member-only story
What Happens When a Celebrity, Unhappy with an AI-Generated Image, Seeks Damages: A Warning to AI Artists.
I recently read an article by Jim The AI Whisperer that got me thinking about the intricate and often uncharted ethical territory of AI-generated art. In his piece, Jim seems to boast about the success of his AI-generated images of Princes William and Harry. Jim’s images, which have garnered widespread attention, epitomize the growing prowess of AI in creating strikingly lifelike depictions. However, Jim’s tone of self-congratulation also brings into sharp focus the complex ethical considerations surrounding such creations. His work raises questions about the rights of public figures to control their likenesses and the broader implications of AI technology in the realm of artistic expression, especially when it intersects with real individuals’ identities.
In the uncharted waters of AI-generated art, a storm is brewing. Let’s consider a potential scenario where a celebrity comes across an AI-created image of themselves, and it’s not a flattering portrayal.
One morning, our beloved actor, known for their philanthropic work and positive public image, wake up to find their social media flooded with notifications about an AI-generated image that has gone viral.
